| Аннотация |
[RUS]
Статья посвящена сопоставительному анализу звукоподражательных орнитонимов. Автор использует языки различных типологий (русский и кумыкский), чтобы выявить идиоэтнические особенности восприятия орнитонимов представителями разных культур.
[ENG]
The subject of the study in the article is onomatopoeic bird's names. Purpose of the research is to conduct a comparative analysis of different systems in the onomatopoetic bird's languages, precisely in Russian and Kumyk. In the work author primarily uses descriptive and comparative methods. In the languages of many nations there are names of animals, based on the imitation of their voices. Sounds that are heard in the cries of animals and people formed the basis for the names of the gecko, keklik, rook, cuckoos, chiffchaff, etc. For the analysis we have selected 112 bird's names in Russian language, of which 38 have onomatopoeic origins, Kumyk ornitonims are much more less. Only 13 of the 62 bird's names in Kumyk are onomatopoeic. Among the onomatopoetic bird's names in Russian and Kumyk there are cross-language bilingual parallelisms, Russian "kukushka" (cuckoo) – is "gyukyuk" in Kumyk, Russian "karga" (crone, derived from the onomatopoeic verb "karkat'" ("croak") – is "k"arg"a" in Kumyk ("crow"). Onomatopoeic bird's names are not only identical, but can be different. In Kumyk names of birds there is a certain amount of borrowings from Russian language. The basic amount of names of birds in Russian language is formed by a synthetic method. In the Kumyk language, by contrast, it is stem-dominated. The analysis of Russian ornithological vocabulary and Kumyk language allowed the author to come to the conclusion that Russian language, compared to the Kumyk, contains dominative number of names of birds of onomatopoeic origin. The principle of the nomination of birds by the same voice matches in Russian and Kumyk names for 11 species. The results of this study are of great importance for the typology of languages of different systems and can be used in the preparation of bilingual dictionar-ies.
|
| Ссылки |
[RUS]
- Воронин С.В. Основы фоносемантики.- Л.: Изд-во ЛГУ, 1982. – 244 с.
- Дмитриев Н.К. Строй тюркских языков. – М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1962. – 608с.
- Жакупова А.Д. Доминантные черты русской языковой картины мира в сопоставлении с польской, украинской, словацкой (на материале наименований птиц) // Русский язык: исторические судьбы и современность. II Международный конгресс исследователей русского языка: труды и материалы. – М.: МГУ, 2004. – С. 449-450.
- Ишбердин Э.Ф. Названия животных и птиц в башкирских говорах: автореф. дисс. … канд. филол. наук.- Уфа, 1970. – 24 с.
- Корнилов О.А. Языковые картины мира как производные национальных менталитетов. – М.: ЧеРО, 2003.- 349 с.
- Севортян Э.В. Этимологический словарь тюркских языков (общетюркские и межтюркские основы на букву «Б»). – М.: Наука, 1978.- 352 с.
- Севортян Э.В. Этимологический словарь тюркских языков (общетюркские и межтюркские основы на буквы «В», «Г» и «Д»). – М.: Наука, 1980.- 396 с.
- Силаева О.Л., Вараксин А.Н., Ильичев В.Д. Имитационные взаимоотношения между человеком и животными: Акустический анализ. – М.: РУДН, 1999. – 49с.
- Стернин И.А. О понятии лингвокультурной специфики языковых явлений // Язык. Словесность. Культура. – 2011. – № 1. – С. 6-19.
- Фасмер М. Этимологический словарь русского языка. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://vasmer.narod.ru/
[ENG]
- Voronin, S.V. (1982) Osnovy fonosemantiki [Phonosemantics bases], LGU, Leningrad, 244 p.
- Dmitriev, N.K. (1962), O kategorii zhenskogo roda v azerbajdzhanskom yazyke. Stroy tyurkskich yazyikov [Upon category of feminine gender in Azerbaijani. Sistem of Turkic languages], AN SSSR, Moscow, 608 p.
- Zhakupova, A.D. (2004), "Dominantnye cherty russkoy yazykovoy kartiny mira v sopostavlenii s pol'skoy, ukrainskoy, slovatskoy (na materiale naimenovaniy ptits). Russkiy yazyk: istoricheskie sud'by i sovremennost", II Mezhdunarodnyy kongress issledovateley russkogo yazyka : Trudy i materialy ["Dominating features of Russian linguistics picture of the world in the comparison with Polish, Ukrainian, Slovak material. Russisn language, historical fortunes and contemporaneity", II international congress of investigators of Russisn language, Works and materials], MGU, Moscow, p. 449.
- Ishberdin, E.F. (1970), Nazvaniya zhivotnych i ptits v bashkirskich govorach: avtoreferat dissertatsii [Animalisms and ornithonims in Bashkir subdialect: abstract of dissertation], Ufa, 24 p.
- Kornilov, O.A. (2003), Yazykovye kartiny mira kak proizvodnye natsionalnych mentalitetov. [Linguistic pictures of the world as derivations of national mentalities], CheRO, Moscow, 349 p.
- Sevortyan, E.V. (1978), Etimologicheskiy slovar' tyurkskich yazykov (obschetyurkskiye i mezhtyurkskiye osnovy na bukvu "B") [Etimological dictionary of Turkic languages (of general Turkic and interturkic bases in the letter "B"], Nauka, Moscow, 352 p.
- Sevortyan, E.V. (1980), Etimologicheskiy slovar' tyurkskich yazykov (obschetyurkskiye i mezhtyurkskiye osnovy na bukvy "V", "G" i "D") [Etimological dictionary of Turkic languages (of general Turkic and interturkic bases in the letter "V", "G" and "D"], Nauka, Moscow, 396 p.
- Silaeva, O.L., Varaksin, A.N., Il'ichev, V.D. (1999), Imitatsionnye vzaimootnosheniya mezhdu chelovekom i zhivotnymi: Akusticheskiy analiz.[Imitating relations between a man and animals:Acoustic analisis], RUDN, Moskow, 49 p.
- Fasmer, M. (1964), Etimologicheskiy slovar' russkogo yazyka. T.1 (A-D). [Etimological dictionary of Russian language], Progress, Moscow, 563 p.
- Fasmer, M. (1964), Etimologicheskiy slovar' russkogo yazyka. T. 2. (E-M) [Etimological dictionary of Russian language], Progress, Moscow, 672 p.
|
