Аннотация / Abstract |
[RUS]
В статье рассматривается процесс вербализации концепта общение в диалогическом дискурсе с точки зрения его коммуникативной функции. В тексте статьи рассмотрен вопрос специфики форм выражения концепта с точки зрения его соответствия сущности самого концепта общение. Дано понятие о том, что с помощью концепта происходит полное построение систем коммуникации, а также предложена логическая упорядоченная определенность диалогического дискурса.
[ENG]
The article deals with the process of verbalization of the concept of communication in a dialogical discourse in terms of its communicative function. The text of the article questions the specificity of different forms of expression of the concept. The author focuses on the concepts of dialogic discourse and dialogic communication, detects the presence of phatic and informative aspects of communication in a dialogical discourse, describes the distinctive features of speech dialogue. The various types of dialogue classification are presented and summarized. Positive communicative effect can often be achieved only with implementing of all the norms of modern speech etiquette. The author refers to the modern theory of linguistic concept. Despite the fact that the concept is a usual notion of linguistics, the question of its definition is still relevant. The author identifies the various tokens used in the Russian communication to express complete or partial agreement, to stimulate or terminate the communication. The author comes to the conclusion that the specific forms for the expression of the concept must correspond to the essence of the concept of communication: using the concept leads a speaker to the complete construction of communication system, as well as the logically ordered certainty dialogic discourse takes its form.
|
Библиография / References |
[RUS]
- Бубнова Г.И. Текстовые категории устного спонтанного диалога // Вопросы системной организации речи. – М., 1987. – С. 47-68.
- Демьянков В.З. Англо-русские термины по прикладной лингвистике и автоматической переработке текста: Вып.2. Методы анализа текста. – М.: Всесоюзный центр переводов ГКНТ и АН СССР, 1982. – 288 с.
- Карасик В.И. Антология концептов. В 2-х тт. Волгоград: Парадигма, 2005.
- Карасик В.И. Культурные концепты: проблема ценностей // Языковая личность: культурные концепты. – Волгоград: Перемена, 1996. – С. 3-16.
- Красавский Н.А. Эмоциональные концепты в немецких и русских лингвокультурах. – Волгоград: Перемена, 2001. – 495 с.
- Кубрякова Е.С. Концепт // Кубрякова Е.С., Демьянков В.З. и др. Краткий словарь когнитивных терминов. – М.: МГУ, 1996. – С. 90-93.
- Леонтович О.А. Русские и американцы: парадоксы межкультурного общения. – М.: Генезис, 2005. – 352 с.
- Степанов Ю.С. Константы: Словарь русской культуры. Опыт исследования. – М.: Языки русской культуры, 1997. – 824 c.
- Сухих С.А. Стратегии коммуникантов в общении // Языковое общение: процессы и единицы. – Калинин, 1988. – С. 22-29.
- Холодная М.А. Интегральные структуры понятийного мышления. – Томск: ТомГУ, 1983. – 190 c.
- Belohlavek R., Vychodil V. Formal concept analysis and linguistic hedges // International Journal of General Systems. – 2012. – № 41 (5). – P. 502-532.
- Bradley D. Functionalism and The Independence Problems // Nous. – 2014. – № 48 (3). – P. 545-557.
- Croom A. Aesthetic Concepts, Perceptual Learning, and Linguistic Enculturation: Considerations from Wittgenstein, Language, and Music // Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science. – 2012. – № 46 (1). – P. 90-117.
- Dove G. Thinking in Words: Language as an Embodied Medium of Thought // Topics in Cognitive Science. – 2014. – № 6 (3). – P. 371-389.
- Hodgson-Drysdale, T. Concepts and language: Developing knowledge in science // Linguistics & Education. – 2014. – № 27. – P. 54-67.
- Keshabyan I. Analysing the Concepts of Vengeance and Hono(u)r in Shakespeare's Hamlet and Sumarokov's Gamlet: A Corpus-based Approach to Literature // International Journal of English Studies. – 2009. – P. 235-257.
- Larraín A., Haye A. A dialogical conception of concepts // Theory & Psychology. – 2014. – № 24 (4). – P. 459-478
- Materna P. Simple Concepts // Acta Analytica. – 2013. – № 28 (3). – P. 295-319.
- Thill S., Padó S., Ziemke T. On the Importance of a Rich Embodiment in the Grounding of Concepts: Perspectives From Embodied Cognitive Science and Computational Linguistics // Topics in Cognitive Science. – 2014. – № 6 (3). – P. 545-558.
- Wierzbicka A. The concept of 'dialogue' in cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspective // Discourse Studies. – 2006. – № 8 (5). – P. 675-703.
[ENG]
- Belohlavek, R., Vychodil, V. (2012) Formal concept analysis and linguistic hedges. International Journal of General Systems, № 41 (5), pp. 502-532.
- Bradley, D. (2014) Functionalism and The Independence Problems. Nous, 48 (3), pp. 545-557.
- Bubnova, G.I. (1987) Tekstovye kategorii ustnogo spontannogo dialoga [Text categories of spontaneous verbal dialogue]. In: Voprosy sistemnoi organizatsii rechi [Questions of systemic speech organization]. Moscow, pp. 47-68.
- Croom, A. (2012) Aesthetic Concepts, Perceptual Learning, and Linguistic Enculturation: Considerations from Wittgenstein, Language, and Music. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 46 (1), pp. 90-117.
- Dem'yankov, V.Z. (1982) Anglo-russkie terminy po prikladnoi lingvistike i avtomaticheskoi pererabotke teksta: Vyp.2. Metody analiza teksta [English-Russian terms for Applied Linguistics and automatic text processing. Issue 2. Methods of text analysis]. Moscow: M.: Union Translation Center SCST and USSR Academy of Sciences.
- Dove, G. (2014) Thinking in Words: Language as an Embodied Medium of Thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6 (3), pp. 371-389.
- Hodgson-Drysdale, T. (2014) Concepts and language: Developing knowledge in science. Linguistics & Education, 27, pp. 54-67.
- Karasik, V.I. (1996) Kul'turnye kontsepty: problema tsennostei [Cultural concepts: the problem of values]. In: Yazykovaya lichnost': kul'turnye kontsepty [Linguistic personality: cultural concepts]. Volgograd: Peremena, pp. 3-16.
- Karasik, V.I. (2005) Antologiya kontseptov [Anthology of concepts]. In 2 vols. Volgograd: Paradigma.
- Keshabyan, I. (2009) Analysing the Concepts of Vengeance and Hono(u)r in Shakespeare's Hamlet and Sumarokov's Gamlet: A Corpus-based Approach to Literature. International Journal of English Studies, pp. 235-257.
- Kholodnaya, M.A. (1983) Integral'nye struktury ponyatiinogo myshleniya [Integral structure of conceptual thinking]. Tomsk: TomGU.
- Krasavskii, N.A. (2001) Emotsional'nye kontsepty v nemetskikh i russkikh lingvokul'turakh [Emotional concepts in German and Russian language culture]. Volgograd: Peremena.
- Kubryakova, E.S. (1996) Kontsept [Concept]. In: Kubryakova, E.S., Dem'yankov, V.Z. et al. Kratkii slovar' kognitivnykh terminov [A short dictionary of cognitive science terms]. Moscow: MGU, pp. 90-93.
- Larraín, A., Haye, A. (2014) A dialogical conception of concepts. Theory & Psychology, 24 (4), pp. 459-478.
- Leontovich, O.A. (2005) Russkie i amerikantsy: paradoksy mezhkul'turnogo obshcheniya [Russian and Americans: Paradoxes of Intercultural Communication]. Moscow: Genezis.
- Materna, P. (2013) Simple Concepts. Acta Analytica, 28 (3), pp. 295-319.
- Stepanov, Yu.S. (1997) Konstanty: Slovar' russkoi kul'tury. Opyt issledovaniya [Constants: Dictionary of Russian culture. Research experience]. Moscow: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury.
- Sukhikh, S.A. (1988) Strategii kommunikantov v obshchenii [Strategies of communicants in the intercourse]. In: Yazykovoe obshchenie: protsessy i edinitsy [Linguistic communication: Processes and units]. Kalinin, pp. 22-29.
- Thill, S., Padó, S., Ziemke, T. (2014) On the Importance of a Rich Embodiment in the Grounding of Concepts: Perspectives From Embodied Cognitive Science and Computational Linguistics. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6 (3), pp. 545-558.
- Wierzbicka, A. (2006) The concept of 'dialogue' in cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspective. Discourse Studies, 8 (5), pp. 675-703.
|